Friday 29 June 2012

Rwanda To Focus On Achievements, As They Celebrates 50 Years Of Independence


m rwanda 501 300x158 Rwanda to focus on achievements, as they celebrates 50 years of IndependenceAs Rwanda celebrates 50 years of independence and 18 years of liberation, Rwandans are reminded to ponder on the achievements, over the past years.
This was revealed in Independency preparation discussions held at Telecom house, by long serving politicians who highlighted the many ways Rwanda has achieved independence through the ruling government.
Tito Rutaremara, former Ombudsman and a senior politician who has witnessed Rwanda’s progresses for over 50 yrs highlighted the reason Rwandans should celebrate their freedom.
“Rwandans should remember the ruthless old days, and therefore celebrate their political, economic and social independence,” Rutaremara told the press.
He also added that, being independent in ideals does not stop one from asking for support from other countries though the solicited support should not have strings attached.
The former Ombudsman reiterated that the 1st of July is a day for Rwandans should ponder  on where the country has come from since 50 years back.
The politicians highlighted different aspects where Rwanda has successfully become independent over the years.
“30-40yrs back, between 70-85 per cent of Rwanda’s budget funds came from foreign donations. Today, Rwanda has successfully improved from 70 per cent of foreign aid to 48 per cent.This is one of the indicators of stead fast development and independence,” observed Prof. Anaste Shyaka, Executive Secretary of Rwanda Governance Board {RGB}.
The highlighted strides to independence include different government projects like Bye-bye Nyakatsi{housing solutions}, Ubudehe{a program that identifies and gives financial support to vulnerable poor Rwandans},9 years of basic education, one cow per family, and many more.
Rwanda celebrates independence on 1st July, every year.

Wednesday 27 June 2012

Bugesera: District To Use More Than 10 Billion Francs In 2012-2013 Budgets


m budget 2 300x173 Bugesera: District to use more than 10 Billion francs in 2012 2013 budgetsThe advisory council of Bugesera district approved the budget for the district that is worth more than10 Billion francs in the economic year 2012-2013.
The money will come from the National Budget from the Ministry of finance and economic planning, district taxes, district partners, selling of unused district equipment, according to Louis Rwagaju the district mayor.
He said, “Infrastructure will be emphasized like road construction and renovations, classrooms for 12YBE, making and preparing the district’s master plans, constructing Karumuna where Bugesera district borders Kicukiro district and Nemba on the border of Rwanda and Burundi.”
Pierre Claver Kabera the chairperson of Advisory council of Bugesera district said that in this budget, about 808 million francs will come from district’s revenue and taxes.
“Taxes include those from Billboards, cleaning in general places, taxes on the services given by the leaders, taxes from telecommunication antennas, notary services, fines asked by administrations, and many others” he clarified.
It was advised that in the next economic budget of 2013-2014, every cell and sector should be having an office building to operate in.
In this special meeting, the district mayor presented the 2012-2013 performing contracts and sectors’ executive secretaries vowed what to fulfil in front of district leaders.

Sunday 24 June 2012

TOP 10 MOST DANGEROUS AFRICAN COUNTRIES ON LIST


m PatentMinesDanger 300x232 TOP 10 MOST DANGEROUS AFRICAN COUNTRIES ON LIST
Global Peace Index has recently released a report on global ranking of countries according to their dangerousness, a dozen African countries are among the most affected by war, terrorism and political instability; but Rwanda is not on the list and is positioned among safe ones.
Since 2007, the Global Peace Index, conducted by the Research Institute of Economics & Peace, class 153 countries of the safest most dangerous. Countries affected by civil wars for years, or face regular violence, are part of the top 10 African countries most dangerous.
The ranking evaluates, among other things, the risk of renewed fighting, the resurgence of political instability and terrorist threats. Among the top ten ranked to be dangerous Ethiopia is ranked the Ten (10) on the list.
More than ten years after the war that opposed to Eritrea, Ethiopia still maintains a tense relationship with the country and conflict: the Ethiopian government has not fully withdrawn its troops from Badme area, the north, and attributed to Eritrea, although the International Court of Justice has precisely defined the borders of both countries.
Ethiopia is also home to separatist movements: the Oromo Liberation Front, which affects the most populated region of Ethiopia to the southwest and the birthplace of important natural resources, the National Liberation Front in the Ogaden, based east on the border with Somalia, has an armed wing, Said the global peace ranking.
9 – Burundi: political instability
Burundi has experienced a civil war for fifteen years because of opposition Tutsi and Hutu rebels. Following a cease-fire, the Hutu rebels of the National Front for the Liberation became a political party. The 2010 elections were fire-proof: the boycott of presidential elections by the opposition and the return of violence show that the country is still far from stability.
8 – Zimbabwe: Renewed violence
Zimbabwe has experienced a wave of violence after the disputed presidential election in 2008: Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai, his main rival, both claimed victory in the first round of elections. The situation has eased in 2009 with the establishment of a system with two-headed as president, Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai as Prime Minister.
In 2010, attempts by the Prime Minister to develop the Constitution have been sabotaged by the camp of Robert Mugabe. Public meetings were banned, arbitrary arrests, looting and ransacking, have pushed the country into violence.
7 – Chad: peaceful relations with neighboring countries
Chad has significantly improved its position by improving relations with neighboring countries. Several agreements signed between 2009 and 2010 led to pacify the country. The political situation has also stabilized.
6 – Nigeria: religious war and economic war
The instability still reigns in the center and south of the country where the reelection of Good luck Jonathan has not changed. Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa with 155 million inhabitants, is marked by a religious conflict at the center, near Jos, where the killings of Muslims and Christians have killed nearly 20,000 people during the last decade.
But religion is not the only reason for conflict and economic needs have led to the southward migration of landless farmers Christians.
Other economic battle in the Niger Delta in the south: the Nigerian government is facing a terrorist group, the Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta (MEND), which attacks the facilities and personnel of oil companies. Kidnappings of expatriates and attacks on oil pipelines are their predilections, negating attempts Armistice incurred by the State.
5 – Libya: civil war
Following the Arab Spring came in February 2011; Libya has entered into a civil war. The protests led to the downfall of the authority of Muammar Gaddafi in the east. Since then, international intervention under the authority of NATO has still not managed to restore calm in the country.
4 – Central African Republic: an eventful year
New entry in the standings: the Central African Republic. The presidential elections have created an environment of tension and unrest within the country. The presence of rebel groups in the border area with Sudan and Chad is also problematic.
Despite the signing of a peace agreement in 2008, some groups have not signed the agreement, are still active. In south-east, the troops of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) led by Joseph Kony, continue unabated.
This group is part of the most violent in the world, has expanded internationally and is present in the DRC and southern Sudan, where he is engaged in looting and
Abductions of civilians.
3 – Democratic Republic of Congo: Terrorist threats increasingly present
The problems of the Democratic Republic of the Congo residing in these activities at the border of its territory and the presence of several armed groups and terrorists in the east. It is mainly in Kivu, in the Great Lakes region, the situation is more difficult. The origin of the conflict: the massive influx of refugees after the Rwandan genocide. An improvement is noted, however, about the tensions between the forces of the national army (FARDC) and the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) on the dominance of territory and resources.
The attempt to integrate SPDC to the regular army and the cease-fire of 2008 is ineffective because regularly violated.
To the east, the Allied Democratic Forces-National Army for the Liberation of Uganda (ADF-NALU), Ugandan rebel movement, is in conflict with the Congolese government. This group is related to the Shabab Somali fundamentalist Islamic group linked to al-Qaida.
2 – Sudan: a multitude of conflicts
The situation in Sudan has worsened from 2010. The country suffers from two years of internal conflict have serious consequences both human and political. To the west, the conflict in Darfur has killed 300,000 people, including those due to famine and disease, and 2.7 million displaced since 2003. Peace, signed in 2006 between the government and the rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), one of the strongest rebel groups, is fragile because all factions did not sign. The UN presence is still needed.
In the South, thanks to self-determination referendum in 2011, the conflict in Southern Sudan is in the process of healing. However, the situation in Abyei, remains uncertain.
1 – Somalia: a generalized civil war for over twenty years
Since 1991, Somalia is facing a civil war difficult, the conflict between the Transitional Federal Government, supported by the UN, and several groups of Islamist rebels, some of which are close to al-Qaida.
Unrecognized within the territory of Somalia, the government of Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed cannot impose his reforms across the country. The only piece of territory it controls is part of the capital Mogadishu, the scene of regular fighting between both sides to maintain control.
Over 1.9 million people or over 20percent of Somalis under the Office of the United Nations for Refugees (UNHCR) have fled the country controlled by fear. Stabilizing the country still seems impossible.
Among all the sub-Saharan African countries which experienced wars in the past 10 years Rwanda have not been ranked among the ten most dangerous countries. 

Wednesday 20 June 2012

Thursday 7 June 2012

UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels In Congo

UNHRC 300x259 UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels In Congo Citing what they termed is a “leaked” memo from the UN Stabilization Mission in the Congo (MONUSCO), last week the BBC and the New York Times  claimed that Rwanda is secretly supporting the M23 rebel movement in Eastern Congo.
Both media organizations reported that eleven deserters from the M23 showed up at a UN base claiming they had been recruited and trained in Rwanda. Neither publication produced an actual memo, nor did they quote sources. The memo was cited around the world as “fact,” with no supporting documentation. The result was a vehement denial by Rwanda’s Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo, who said claims that Rwandans were transferred to eastern Congo to fight for the rebels are “categorically false and dangerous.”
“M23 Congo” and it is obvious that accounts of the leaked report have gone viral. But is it correct? Does the report exist? What, exactly, does it say?
The latest comment from the UN says the BBC got it wrong.
U.N. spokesman Penangnini Toure told Voice of America (VOA) that the UN report resulted from a “routine interrogation of the 11 men who had presented themselves to the UN and asked to be repatriated to Rwanda.”
“That’s all we reported and that’s where it stops. The U.N. did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo,” said Toure.
SAPA also reported that there was no evidence Rwanda recruited the “mutineers.”
The United Nations on Wednesday confirmed 11 Rwandans had been recruited to join army mutineers in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, but said there was no evidence the Rwandan government played any role.
As the reports of the leaked memo spread exponentially via the internet and social media, an already strained relationship between The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda has been tested and tensions have spilled over into Congo’s Parliament. Opposition lawmakers want any discussion of relations with Rwanda to be debated in public, to avoid the appearance of any “secret deals.”

On Wednesday May 30, the president of the assembly ruled that debate would require a closed session. A number of opposition MPs walked out. On the same day as the walk-out, Radio Okapi (UN) reported that MONUSCO refused to confirm or refute the involvement of Rwanda  in the conflict in eastern DRC.

The “leaked memo” is beginning to look more and more like a propaganda trial balloon that has sprung a leak. It may have been MONUSCO’s attempt to cover its failures in eastern Congo by blaming Rwanda for the latest insurgencies. Or it may have been a low level staffer trying to curry favor with the international press.
In a press release, The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) expressed concern about civilians targeted in fighting between the rebels and government forces that has displaced more than 100,000 people in eastern Congo since April.

Rwanda’s Minister Mushikiwabo accused MONUSCO of failure to implement its mandate and suggests that the “leaked memo” is an attempt to shift blame and justify MONUSCO’s “bloated budgets.”

This billion-dollar-a-year operation makes up one quarter of the UN’s entire peacekeeping budget, and yet it has been a failure from day one. Instead of pursuing its mandate to eradicate the FDLR menace and help stabilise the region, MONUSCO has become a destabilizing influence, primarily concerned with keeping hold of its bloated budgets and justifying its ongoing existence. Rwanda has received several refugees who are severely wounded and traumatised as a result of the UN’s failure to protect civilians in eastern DRC.
A source close to M23 told says that the persons presenting themselves as “deserters” and “defectors” from M23 “did not come from the front lines.” Instead it is more likely that individuals were bribed by Congolese commanders to go to MONUSCO and say they were defecting, said the source.

According to VOA, the United Nations has said categorically that it “did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo.”

Source( UN report VOA)

Rwanda : UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels in Congo

UNHRC | Rwanda Citing what they termed is a “leaked” memo from the UN Stabilization Mission in the Congo (MONUSCO), last week the BBC and the New York Times claimed that Rwanda is secretly supporting the M23 rebel movement in Eastern Congo.
Both media organizations reported that eleven deserters from the M23 showed up at a UN base claiming they had been recruited and trained in Rwanda. Neither publication produced an actual memo, nor did they quote sources. The memo was cited around the world as “fact,” with no supporting documentation. The result was a vehement denial by Rwanda’s Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo, who said claims that Rwandans were transferred to eastern Congo to fight for the rebels are “categorically false and dangerous.”
“M23 Congo” and it is obvious that accounts of the leaked report have gone viral. But is it correct? Does the report exist? What, exactly, does it say?
The latest comment from the UN says the BBC got it wrong.
U.N. spokesman Penangnini Toure told Voice of America (VOA) that the UN report resulted from a “routine interrogation of the 11 men who had presented themselves to the UN and asked to be repatriated to Rwanda.”
“That’s all we reported and that’s where it stops. The U.N. did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo,” said Toure.
SAPA also reported that there was no evidence Rwanda recruited the “mutineers.”
The United Nations on Wednesday confirmed 11 Rwandans had been recruited to join army mutineers in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, but said there was no evidence the Rwandan government played any role.
As the reports of the leaked memo spread exponentially via the internet and social media, an already strained relationship between The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda has been tested and tensions have spilled over into Congo’s Parliament. Opposition lawmakers want any discussion of relations with Rwanda to be debated in public, to avoid the appearance of any “secret deals.”

On Wednesday May 30, the president of the assembly ruled that debate would require a closed session. A number of opposition MPs walked out. On the same day as the walk-out, Radio Okapi (UN) reported that MONUSCO refused to confirm or refute the involvement of Rwanda  in the conflict in eastern DRC.

The “leaked memo” is beginning to look more and more like a propaganda trial balloon that has sprung a leak. It may have been MONUSCO’s attempt to cover its failures in eastern Congo by blaming Rwanda for the latest insurgencies. Or it may have been a low level staffer trying to curry favor with the international press.
In a press release, The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) expressed concern about civilians targeted in fighting between the rebels and government forces that has displaced more than 100,000 people in eastern Congo since April.

Rwanda’s Minister Mushikiwabo accused MONUSCO of failure to implement its mandate and suggests that the “leaked memo” is an attempt to shift blame and justify MONUSCO’s “bloated budgets.”

This billion-dollar-a-year operation makes up one quarter of the UN’s entire peacekeeping budget, and yet it has been a failure from day one. Instead of pursuing its mandate to eradicate the FDLR menace and help stabilise the region, MONUSCO has become a destabilizing influence, primarily concerned with keeping hold of its bloated budgets and justifying its ongoing existence. Rwanda has received several refugees who are severely wounded and traumatised as a result of the UN’s failure to protect civilians in eastern DRC.
A source close to M23 told says that the persons presenting themselves as “deserters” and “defectors” from M23 “did not come from the front lines.” Instead it is more likely that individuals were bribed by Congolese commanders to go to MONUSCO and say they were defecting, said the source.

According to VOA, the United Nations has said categorically that it “did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo.”

Source( UN report VOA)

Rwanda : UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels in Congo

UNHRC 300x259 Rwanda : UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels in CongoCiting what they termed is a “leaked” memo from the UN Stabilization Mission in the Congo (MONUSCO), last week the BBC and the New York Times  claimed that Rwanda is secretly supporting the M23 rebel movement in Eastern Congo.
Both media organizations reported that eleven deserters from the M23 showed up at a UN base claiming they had been recruited and trained in Rwanda. Neither publication produced an actual memo, nor did they quote sources. The memo was cited around the world as “fact,” with no supporting documentation. The result was a vehement denial by Rwanda’s Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo, who said claims that Rwandans were transferred to eastern Congo to fight for the rebels are “categorically false and dangerous.”
“M23 Congo” and it is obvious that accounts of the leaked report have gone viral. But is it correct? Does the report exist? What, exactly, does it say?
The latest comment from the UN says the BBC got it wrong.
U.N. spokesman Penangnini Toure told Voice of America (VOA) that the UN report resulted from a “routine interrogation of the 11 men who had presented themselves to the UN and asked to be repatriated to Rwanda.”
“That’s all we reported and that’s where it stops. The U.N. did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo,” said Toure.
SAPA also reported that there was no evidence Rwanda recruited the “mutineers.”
The United Nations on Wednesday confirmed 11 Rwandans had been recruited to join army mutineers in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, but said there was no evidence the Rwandan government played any role.
As the reports of the leaked memo spread exponentially via the internet and social media, an already strained relationship between The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda has been tested and tensions have spilled over into Congo’s Parliament. Opposition lawmakers want any discussion of relations with Rwanda to be debated in public, to avoid the appearance of any “secret deals.”

On Wednesday May 30, the president of the assembly ruled that debate would require a closed session. A number of opposition MPs walked out. On the same day as the walk-out, Radio Okapi (UN) reported that MONUSCO refused to confirm or refute the involvement of Rwanda  in the conflict in eastern DRC.

The “leaked memo” is beginning to look more and more like a propaganda trial balloon that has sprung a leak. It may have been MONUSCO’s attempt to cover its failures in eastern Congo by blaming Rwanda for the latest insurgencies. Or it may have been a low level staffer trying to curry favor with the international press.
In a press release, The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) expressed concern about civilians targeted in fighting between the rebels and government forces that has displaced more than 100,000 people in eastern Congo since April.

Rwanda’s Minister Mushikiwabo accused MONUSCO of failure to implement its mandate and suggests that the “leaked memo” is an attempt to shift blame and justify MONUSCO’s “bloated budgets.”

This billion-dollar-a-year operation makes up one quarter of the UN’s entire peacekeeping budget, and yet it has been a failure from day one. Instead of pursuing its mandate to eradicate the FDLR menace and help stabilise the region, MONUSCO has become a destabilizing influence, primarily concerned with keeping hold of its bloated budgets and justifying its ongoing existence. Rwanda has received several refugees who are severely wounded and traumatised as a result of the UN’s failure to protect civilians in eastern DRC.
A source close to M23 told says that the persons presenting themselves as “deserters” and “defectors” from M23 “did not come from the front lines.” Instead it is more likely that individuals were bribed by Congolese commanders to go to MONUSCO and say they were defecting, said the source.

According to VOA, the United Nations has said categorically that it “did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo.”

Source( UN report VOA)

UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels in Congo


UNHRC 300x259 UN: No Evidence Rwanda Supported M23 Rebels in Congo
Citing what they termed is a “leaked” memo from the UN Stabilization Mission in the Congo (MONUSCO), last week the BBC and the New York Times claimed that Rwanda is secretly supporting the M23 rebel movement in Eastern Congo.
Both media organizations reported that eleven deserters from the M23 showed up at a UN base claiming they had been recruited and trained in Rwanda. Neither publication produced an actual memo, nor did they quote sources. The memo was cited around the world as “fact,” with no supporting documentation. The result was a vehement denial by Rwanda’s Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo, who said claims that Rwandans were transferred to eastern Congo to fight for the rebels are “categorically false and dangerous.”
“M23 Congo” and it is obvious that accounts of the leaked report have gone viral. But is it correct? Does the report exist? What, exactly, does it say?
The latest comment from the UN says the BBC got it wrong.
U.N. spokesman Penangnini Toure told Voice of America (VOA) that the UN report resulted from a “routine interrogation of the 11 men who had presented themselves to the UN and asked to be repatriated to Rwanda.”
“That’s all we reported and that’s where it stops. The U.N. did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo,” said Toure.
SAPA also reported that there was no evidence Rwanda recruited the “mutineers.”
The United Nations on Wednesday confirmed 11 Rwandans had been recruited to join army mutineers in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, but said there was no evidence the Rwandan government played any role.
As the reports of the leaked memo spread exponentially via the internet and social media, an already strained relationship between The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda has been tested and tensions have spilled over into Congo’s Parliament. Opposition lawmakers want any discussion of relations with Rwanda to be debated in public, to avoid the appearance of any “secret deals.”

On Wednesday May 30, the president of the assembly ruled that debate would require a closed session. A number of opposition MPs walked out. On the same day as the walk-out, Radio Okapi (UN) reported that MONUSCO refused to confirm or refute the involvement of Rwanda  in the conflict in eastern DRC.

The “leaked memo” is beginning to look more and more like a propaganda trial balloon that has sprung a leak. It may have been MONUSCO’s attempt to cover its failures in eastern Congo by blaming Rwanda for the latest insurgencies. Or it may have been a low level staffer trying to curry favor with the international press.
In a press release, The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) expressed concern about civilians targeted in fighting between the rebels and government forces that has displaced more than 100,000 people in eastern Congo since April.

Rwanda’s Minister Mushikiwabo accused MONUSCO of failure to implement its mandate and suggests that the “leaked memo” is an attempt to shift blame and justify MONUSCO’s “bloated budgets.”

This billion-dollar-a-year operation makes up one quarter of the UN’s entire peacekeeping budget, and yet it has been a failure from day one. Instead of pursuing its mandate to eradicate the FDLR menace and help stabilise the region, MONUSCO has become a destabilizing influence, primarily concerned with keeping hold of its bloated budgets and justifying its ongoing existence. Rwanda has received several refugees who are severely wounded and traumatised as a result of the UN’s failure to protect civilians in eastern DRC.
A source close to M23 told says that the persons presenting themselves as “deserters” and “defectors” from M23 “did not come from the front lines.” Instead it is more likely that individuals were bribed by Congolese commanders to go to MONUSCO and say they were defecting, said the source.

According to VOA, the United Nations has said categorically that it “did not produce a report saying that Rwanda is directly involved in what is happening in eastern Congo.”

Source( UN report VOA)

Rwanda : English mentors from the region start arriving

Information from the Rwanda Education board (REB) has confirmed that few of the recruited English mentors from the region have arrived in the country.
According to the Director General of REB Dr. John Rutayisire, over a hundred of the 300 recruited teachers are already in the country. The teachers are mainly from Uganda and Kenya.
The programme to recruit these teachers had targeted about 4, 000, but met difficulty after it registered a small turn up.
The initial plan was solely recruit them from Kenya, but government decided to cast the net wider to include other countries after Kenya could not ably satisfy the demand.
The low turn up of applicants for the Rwandan teaching jobs was partly attributed to the salary which is considered low. The successful applicants are supposed to be paid a monthly salary of Rwf200, 000, which is less than 500 US Dollars.
The aim of enlisting the services of these teachers, who, according to the minister, will have a contract of three to four years, is to help improve the proficiency in the English language of local teachers.
The arrangement comes to boost the skills of the teachers in Rwanda, three years after the country switched to English as the language of instruction in schools in 2008.
The country is still facing a problem of fluent English since the switch because there was need to train them in the language after its introduction due to the fact that they were predominantly French speakers.
According to the ministry, 43,000 teachers have so far been trained in the English language. The first batch was trained for three months between November 2009 and January 2010.
The mentors will not only be charged with teaching students, but will also teach their local counterparts in a “trainer of trainers” arrangement that seeks to have Rwandan teachers speak English fluently as a means of improving their competence.
Rutayisire says that upon arrival, the teachers sign work contracts and are deployed in rural schools, where there is more need for teachers compared to city schools.
He said that they are still receiving them and more are still needed to satisfy the demand.
However, though the Ministry is going through a hard time now, it is planning to come up with a method which will help the country have enough qualified teachers in a sustainable manner.
There has been an increase of hours for those studying to become teachers at Teachers Training Colleges (TTCs) from three to five hours a day where they are trained in grammar and literature skills as one way of ensuring sustainability.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Walgreens Printable Coupons